By Haresh A. Raichura
The difference in the quality of present-day law reports and in quality of Law Reports which were published in 1939 is huge.
You know everything about present-day law reports if you are still buying them. There will be headnotes and then judgements. Mostly, you will not see “Editor’s note” anywhere.
I once saw a 1939 Bombay Law Report.
It contained Editor’s Notes, Letters to Editor (In the letters, lawyers used to comment on judgements published in the previous volume), and then Jokes and Poems contributed by lawyers and then headnotes and then judgements.
That Law Report volume looked alive!
What do you think on this? Leave a comment below!
Haresh A. Raichura is an AOR at the Supreme Court of India. Follow him on Linkedin here.


![Call for Papers: Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Journal [Vol 5, Issue 1]: Submit by July 15 Comparative Constitutional Law and Administrative Law Journal](https://blogs.lawships.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/title628569475-e1533805309133.png)

![JOB POST: Counsel at Citi Private Bank, Mumbai [PQE 6-8Y]: Application Open citi](https://blogs.lawships.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/citi.png)


![JOB POST: Professors at Indian Institute of Technology [IIT], Delhi: Applications Open Indian Institute of Technology [IIT], Delhi](https://blogs.lawships.in/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/download.jpeg)









